No spending? Rangers board appears to make it clear

No spending? Rangers board appears to make it clear
The chairman isn't sitting happily on these numbers....

The message from Rangers’ board is pretty clear – despite all the revenue coming in the past 10+ months, despite the fact £130M has come in from UEL, sales and UCL – Stewart Robertson has made it abundantly stark that little to no spending is taking place from any of it.

No shiny new players, no big signings in January – by pouring cold water over the amount of revenue Rangers have earned from the UCL, Robertson indirectly announced we’re not going to spend much if anything in the winter window.

Fans are wondering why.

They are wondering where the £23M for Bassey, the £16M for Patterson and the £10M for Joe Aribo went. Well, we partly explained that by suggesting that even though those are the fees for those players, they are gross, and that money will funnel in over a longer period as part of instalments.

We didn’t immediately get that cash up front as disposable.

Now, allowances are made for this by selling clubs – they too will expect payments in instalments, especially bigger signings, but the managing director’s announcement about UCL income, whether accurate or not, does confirm little spending can take place in January either.


Because whether he’s telling the truth or otherwise, he’s giving a reason as to why the UCL cash wasn’t the £40M (he’s claiming less than 20), meaning he’s claiming we have less money than the fans and press think, which consequently gives the club a justified reason (to themselves anyway) as to why we can’t afford to spend next month.

He can do that with all the sales; by revealing ‘reasons’ why we didn’t make this or that, why the press is wrong, why the coffers don’t have the £130M in them, most likely ‘far from it’, he’s pre-empting reasons we can’t spend big in January.

It doesn’t matter what we did or didn’t make, the board can spin it how they like in order to defend not spending.

The accounts are out soon, and while the accountants will have a jolly good look and forensically examine them (Ibrox Noise’s resident financial guru will certainly pore through them with a toothcomb) even if the experts discover a massive profit, the club will find some jargon to defend not spending it on players. To deny it. Or to explain how it’s been ringfenced for something else very important.

In short, we doubt we’ll ever spend much under this board, whether it’s via repaying loans (to themselves, of course) or any other reasons.

We definitely don’t expect much in January beyond loans, freebies and the most modest of spending.

No posts to display


  1. Whilst profits are important, obviously, the critical factor is cash flow. If there is not enough cash available through bank balances, borrowing or share/loan investment, then there won’t be enough available to buy players. The accounts will be important but, as they will reflect the position some months ago, they will not reflect the current position. Any chance of interim accounts?

  2. As you say everyone will go over the accounts thoroughly and even without some or all of the funds from transfers etc. we have made it will better tell a good story. Let’s be blatantly obvious if this board believes that this club can exist without winning the league then they are deluded. As I’ve mentioned the current share majority holders are within the board apart from Mr King so they control everything , board elections, current squad, property management Ibrox upgrades, Auchenhowie, and including the Museum/store construction , sale of a section Albion Car Park. The fans just keep buying record sales of Season and Euro tickets . So if we keep underachieving in the League i.e. not winning it , or not improving the squad….something will change I promise you.

  3. I think the accounts will be very helpful. My understanding was that loans were turned into equity, so there are few debts if any.
    As Leslie says, cashflow is also important. I suspect we may buy in January, depending on whether Kent and/or Morelos sign on again. Our youth strikers are not quite ready yet and Roofe cannot be relied on, so we have to replace Morelos for a couple of years.

  4. How the board did not see that they needed central defenders in the summer transfer window is beyond believe . They should have kept Katie for cover sands is not a central defender we all the fans could see this.

Comments are closed.