Is Rangers’ board talking rubbish? Rival chairman makes claim

2
Is Rangers’ board talking rubbish? Rival chairman makes claim
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Stuart Wallace/BPI/Shutterstock 11882284e Rangers Chief Executive Stewart Robertson arrives at Ibrox Stadium Rangers v Celtic, Scottish Premiership, Football, Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow, UK - 2 May 2021 EDITORIAL USE ONLY No use with unauthorised audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos or live services. Online in-match use limited to 120 images, no video emulation. No use in betting, games or single club/league/player publications. Rangers v Celtic, Scottish Premiership, Football, Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow, UK - 2 May 2021 EDITORIAL USE ONLY No use with unauthorised audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos or live services. Online in-match use limited to 120 images, no video emulation. No use in betting, games or single club/league/player publications. PUBLICATIONxINxGERxSUIxAUTXHUNxGRExMLTxCYPxROMxBULxUAExKSAxONLY Copyright: xStuartxWallace/BPI/Shutterstockx 11882284e

The comments from Dons chairman Dave Carmack initially scream of sour grapes because since when are Aberdeen ever going to agree with Rangers and Stewart Robertson on anything? But equally regulars not only know Ibrox Noise has not agreed with our managing director on much lately, but even more tellingly, our valued readers have supported our criticism.

And Cormack’s points, especially the notion of how Robertson’s comparison with Sweden is complete nonsense, do ring true and further support the idea Rangers’ chief is spouting piffle he is unable to back up with facts.

The one that screams out is the TV deal comparison – we already poured cold water on what Robertson was arguing, that Sweden’s TV deal ‘proves’ that Scotland should have the same one.

But Cormack adds a further point – Scotland, or the SPFL, only sell a portion of our matches live per season, while Sweden sells every single one of them – so their deal is worth more because, well, the broadcasters are getting a tonne more for their money.

There’s also the nonsense about comparing us with England, which Robertson did – did you know, for example, that the Old Firm match between Rangers and Celtic gets only 25% of the viewers Wolves v Leicester gets? That’s right – PL matches average around 5M viewers on Sky and BT, but the Old Firm (Sky only) never gets much beyond about 1.5M.

Sadly, the game north of the border doesn’t have the value, and even the jewel in the crown of the Old Firm doesn’t elevate it that much.

But how can Robertson compare us to Sweden when, as we illustrated before, there’s not a single comparable trait to use?

Unless, as Cormack says, we want to sell every single live match to increase the package value, the Sweden scenario is apples to oranges.

No, our board has a habit of talking utter rubbish these days, and you know it’s bad when the Dons chairman proves it.

No posts to display

2 COMMENTS

  1. The long and short of it is that rangers irrespective of what the sheepmen say ,do not think 2.4 million from sky for showing their games is value for money .I agree 100 percent and have been saying this for a long time .
    I dont care if the spl not happy ,they were quick enough to vote putting us down ! .I am sure rangers will get by without the mammoth monies on offer every year, will they ? what goes around comes around .

  2. Apparantley It has been signed off for next 5 years now anyway ,so it is the crumbs again for next 5 years .I dont know what we will do with all that cash ……..

Comments are closed.