Monday, 7 October 2019

Ryan Christie disgrace highlights the difference between Rangers and Celtic


The difference between Rangers and Celtic on the pitch grew closer yesterday, and indeed some would certainly argue the Ibrox side maybe matched or even overtook their East End rivals in the course of the afternoon.

However, the difference off the pitch between Rangers and Celtic fans could not have been laid more bare over the past four days following the difference between the response to James Tavernier’s horror night in Berne last Thursday, and Celtic’s Ryan Christie’s misdemeanour v Livi (not to mention Jordan Jones’ indiscretion v Celtic).

Let’s have a look at all these in turn:

Jones, following an overall horrific Old Firm for Rangers, came on, did brightly enough, but then inexplicably threw himself into a dreadful tackle, and got an instant red plus prolonged absence from the side through injury and suspension as a result.

Then recently Tavernier had a horrendous night effectively gifting Young Boys the 3 points on the night with some calamitous defending. It was genuinely rotten play and called the captain’s armband into question.

Neither of these attracted any abuse from fans. Criticism, yes, tonnes, but no abuse.

Celtic’s Ryan Christie yesterday got himself red carded for a stupid studs-high challenge – Celtic lost the game and the attacker was forced to close his social media account due to fan abuse.

See the difference?

We’re not claiming Rangers fans are angels – any regular to this site knows we call out our fans when they make mistakes, and they do make mistakes. We’ve backed the board on condemning the idiots who sang overseas and kept costing the club. So we’re not hypocritical here.

But we really cannot remember too many occasions one of our players was forced into coming off social media due to the abuse of his own fans.

And that appears to be the difference – while Rangers fans have plenty history for bad behaviour, little of it appears to be aimed at our own players. Even when they make mistakes, and they do make mistakes, fans appear to draw the line at abusing them.

Criticise, yes, castigate, absolutely – but smear and slur with foul language and launch a volley of abuse?

That’s more the Celtic Way we think.

5 comments:

  1. I its tough at the top!
    WATPπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
    5 is the magic number,alot of 5's around this season
    55 WATP LOVING ITπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    ReplyDelete
  2. what about christie ,nicham, they should be banned ,diffrent rules for rangers why no pundits highlight this mcoist, thompson ,e,t,c , gerrard doing great job with players as he knows one bad tackle our players are getting suspended ,r,t,i,d

    ReplyDelete
  3. No comment from the sportscene team about cosgrove bad foul near the end of the game and already booked should have walked but pops up to score the equalizer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree an element of the Celtic support are very fickle.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tavernier got on my nerves, the amount of times he got exposed. But abuse, no. Criticism yes and loads of it. The thing is, if players don'y know how the fans feel, they may keep making the same mistakes. Tavernier, has definitely learned.

    ReplyDelete

By commenting on this article on Ibroxnoise.co.uk, you confirm you have read and understood the site terms, conditions, and moderation parameters (provided on the home page) of doing so.