Friday, 5 October 2018

Is controversial player selection out of Steven Gerrard's hands?



Last night’s heroics against Rapid Vienna in a match where expectations had been modest have left Rangers fans in a much better place than 3pm on Sunday.

Following that atrocity in Livingston, the side produced, as Steven Gerrard almost rightly said, their finest 90 under him. We’d give honourable mentions to the win in Croatia and the draw in Russia, but this is splitting hairs.

Regardless, there is a lot to chew through, but one curate’s egg is definitely simmering in the form of the frequently-present Ovie Ejaria, and there is little doubt this player, despite his regular starts under Gerrard, is nowhere near a fan-favourite.

Why is this? Why is a promising young creative midfielder simply not popular with the fans? It’s certainly not the Josh Windass syndrome of attacking them on social media or frankly disgracing himself and the club with certain antics. No, it has to be something else.

True, his interviews have been pretty horrific – answers which frequently appear shorter than the questions and a truly questionable enthusiasm level during said media performances unlike the clear joy someone like Lassana Coulibaly had when arriving in Govan probably didn’t endear him.

But that, while slightly regrettable, is usually forgotten when the player delivers on the pitch. And this is where our problems probably start with the playmaker.

It’s not like Ovie Ejaria has been awful – he hasn’t. But there’s usually a balance between ‘deserve’ and apparent ‘divine right’ when it comes to playing and Ejaria has rarely appeared to earn his place, often starting regardless of how he is playing. Some argue about a loans’ clause where he, Ryan Kent and others have a contractual stipulation to game time, and it’s regardless of earning their place. We can’t confirm or deny the existence of this. But it’s not the only issue.

The really important stuff – what he actually does on the pitch. We’ve seen him scoring just two goals and making absolutely no assists at all. For a creative midfielder, without being too harsh, this is utterly pathetic. Especially one who’s made 13 starts and 4 sub appearances.

However, he has shown a lot of technical quality, composure on the ball and generally decent use of it when in congested midfield. The problem with Ovie Ejaria is there is no quality when it comes to advanced midfield. He mostly takes the wrong option, either holding onto the ball way too long before losing it, or passing to the wrong man, often having it intercepted.

We also noted last night, for the first time, the guy has absolutely no pace, and we had to agree with observations of laziness when it came to getting caught offside with astonishing naivety.

This isn’t a 17-year old kid, folks. He’s two years Glenn Middleton’s senior and if he’s to develop as an AM he needs to learn and quickly.

The problem we really have more than anything is we feel we quite simply have better options than Ejaria. We have a glut of midfielders, fit or unfit – Coulibaly, Arfield, Halliday, Jack, Rossiter, Dorrans, McCrorie you name it – and we honestly can’t justify Ejaria starting ahead of a single one of those if all fit.

And yet the lad still seems to start most matches. In fact, knee injury aside which forced him out of the Villarreal match and Dundee match respectively, Ovie Ejaria has featured in every single Rangers match as a starter or sub this season.

We can’t help but feel that while he by no means disgraces himself out there, he just doesn’t cut it.

We ran a poll some weeks ago and most responses rejected him as a starter. Unfortunately, we suspect that choice isn’t entirely in Gerrard’s hands.

9 comments:

  1. The lad was outstanding last night.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Choice is not in his Hands

    In Worrall's Loan Agreement and Ejaria's Loan Agreement their is a 'Game-Time' Clause

    ...Not Sure about Kent 🙄

    I also think Karanka had a cheek to stipulate about a 'Game Time' clause given he spent like £20mill restructuring Forest's Defence making Worrall 5th Choice so He wouldnt have Played Anyway! 👊

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aye defo a clause in there got to be Stevo.. Katic has been a standout so far with big CG so must feel a bit hard done by a little.. Thing is the boys a pro and it’s a long campaign with Europe too.. Have no doubt he will get back in and keep his spot..

      A piss take with these clauses nowadays tbh Karankaw has just proved that..

      Delete
    2. Hope So Cause I dont see what is so Special about Joe Worrall

      Id Rather have Had Adarabioyo than Worrall

      Delete
  3. No-one has any proof of "game time". I also don't believe SG would agree to such clauses in any agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ejaria might only have two assists as you stated IN but he could thread the eye of a needle with his eye for a through balk... His ball to Alf for the penalty - so if he’d scored would’ve been 3 assists. Best of all was his exquisite chip on Sunday v Livi if Candeias had buried that chance would’ve made 4 assists. Then his effort saved from the keeper last night so with a bit more luck his goal and assists would’ve improved..He’s not as bad as made out by most..

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sorry but this is miles off on Ejaria. The lad is streets ahead of most midfielders in Scotland and should become a full international. His desire to receive and use the ball since day one has been impressive given his lack of senior game time. Worrall will also prove to be an excellent piece of business - no use grumbling because a favourite makes way. It’s about the team.

    ReplyDelete

By commenting on this article on Ibroxnoise.co.uk, you confirm you have read and understood the site terms, conditions, and moderation parameters (provided on the home page) of doing so.