Monday, 10 September 2018

Does ex-Rangers man's comments shed new light on January 'mistake'?


With this morning’s latest ‘he said she said’ over David Bates and his departure, it does raise an interesting question, and one which may endure given Rangers’ struggles this summer in the defensive transfer market;

Both David Bates and Danny Wilson have stated, to no subsequent denial by the club, that they were not offered new contracts and both were happy to play for the same salary they were already on.

In short, despite press speculation and certain staff members claiming both were offered new deals, it is more than a bit suspicious that both denied this explicitly.

And while Rangers did well to sign up Connor Goldson and Nikola Katic in defence, that only in the past two weeks have Gareth McAuley and Joe Worrall (on loan) signed up too does make us wonder if holding onto Bates and Wilson might have been a better move while adding Goldson and Katic to them.

We envisage a scenario where those four would have been rather decent depth at the back, because, with all due respect to both McAuley and Worrall, one is 38 and one is 21, and neither is familiar with Scottish football. Bates and Wilson were.

This is not to write off the new signings, but rather to suggest that it took two months to find them while at times our main two ran on fumes could have been avoided had Wilson and Bates remained on the books.

Of course, it’s all ifs and buts. We have no fundamental issue with either of the new acquisitions, and they could turn out excellently for us. But that Gerrard had to go so long without anyone else to call upon at the back does suggest, with 20/20 hindsight, that perhaps holding onto both defenders might have been a slightly better call.

Que sera sera.



survey solutions

4 comments:

  1. I'd have kept Danny but that boy bates is the worst defender on the PLANET!! He wouldnt get a game for Carrick Rangers nevermind the famous.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would have kept both as backup, but it didn't happen. Would they both be happy as reserves? Doubt it. So we would now have 2 unhappy CBs in the squad.
    I thought Bates was good at what he did, but limited. Scotland are crying out for decent CBs, yet neither was called up. When you are rated lower than the CBs Scotland have, Rangers don't need you

    ReplyDelete
  3. We could have used Danny in the second half of last season. Might have finished higher in the table had he stayed? Bates was good at times and terrible at others but he had Russell Martin beside him ffs. Goldson would struggle playing alongside that muppet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Letting Wilson and Bates go was a big Mistake but their is no point dwelling on it as Goldson and Katic is a Big Improvement/Upgrade

    But would have been good to have a Defence of :

    RB - Tav & Flanagan
    CB - Goldson, Katic, McAuley, Wilson, Bates
    LB - Barisic & Wallace

    ReplyDelete

By commenting on this article on Ibroxnoise.co.uk, you confirm you have read and understood the site terms, conditions, and moderation parameters (provided on the home page) of doing so.