Has Steven Gerrard just dropped a big hint about Jake Cooper?


As regular readers to Ibrox Noise over the years will know, one thing this site has paid close attention to is semantics.

We take significant pride in our analysis of how our managers speak, and what they say – we meticulously pore through the wording, and flush out the contradictions.

One of our favourites was Mark Warburton’s comical lies about weeks to ten days for pretty much every player who was out injured, and another was exposing Graeme Murty’s real allegiances when he described Celtic Park as ‘second to none’.

The point is we pay attention, and that’s why, when Steven Gerrard spoke yesterday at his pre-Shkupi press conference alongside new signing Umar Sadiq, we were especially intrigued by how he addressed the Jake Cooper story.

Let’s first sift through what he said:

“I answered to the question to yourself last week about speculation and I don’t like to add to speculations especially when players belong to other clubs. So I won’t be adding to any kind of speculation.”

Fair enough we might think?

However, when asked about another target recently, ironically enough the man sitting next to him, Gerrard’s response on the 24th of June was completely different:

“We’re fans of Umar Sadiq, we do like the player. Sadiq would bring us a forward option — height, power and presence. He’s a player who works too hard, believe it or not. He does tons and tons of running. He’s very enthusiastic. We’ve got an interest, but at the moment Sadiq is still a Roma player. It’s ongoing. We’ll have to see how that one materialises, but he’s someone we like.”

In short, it appears if a player is a serious interest, Stevie may be prepared to discuss them, but if they’re not, it either gets flat out denial or a non-comment.

Now this isn’t scientific, of course, and semantics are only the study of language structure and how we use words for specific purposes, but the two juxtaposing responses there to two different reported transfer targets are very revealing.

Indeed, we discussed recently how Gerrard had dismissed six players as being interests (much to the vehement disagreement of some of you good readers), but the one he did admit was Sadiq. Lo and behold the rest have faded from press association and Sadiq sits in Govan.

Cooper is one we’d like, and we will see if there is fire underneath the smoke, but it is nevertheless intriguing how differently Stevie G has addressed two transfer stories.


  1. I see no benefit in over analysing the words of the manager. What will be will be and what the players do on the pitch is ALL that matters.

  2. Could it be that Sadiq was always intended as a loan signing? Because we've made a (reported) bid for Jake Cooper as a permanent signing that Stevie G didn't want to comment and out any potential deal at risk?

  3. Think the difference here is that Umar Sadiq was/is a loan signing; whereas Jake Cooper is an actual transfer with a fee involved

  4. Course it could be that Roma had made it public that they wanted Sadiq to go out on loan whereas Millwall are desperate to hold on to Jake Miller. Who knows.

  5. Or it could be that he knew the discussions were advance with Sadiq and it was only a matter of when he come. Where as with couper there has been no agreement to date, in fact there’s a big difference betweeen both clubs opinions

  6. Agree with everyone above re loan vs perm signing and the desire of the other club to sel. However, it may also be that there had already been talks with Umar and we knew he wanted on board. Saying the same with regards to cooper could look like snide and a move to unsettle the player before being granted permission to talk. It's all club dealing politics

Comments are closed.