Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Pedro has a big decision to make


Ex-Rangers enforcer Kevin Thomson has advocated a change in formation for the Old Firm clash later this month, suggesting an extra midfielder while sacrificing a striker.

Whether you agree with his opinion, could a change in formation, whatever it may be, be a wise move from Pedro Caixinha for what will be a very difficult game?

When the Portuguese signed up at Ibrox, his initial formation moved away from his predecessor’s 4-3-3 by picking a 4-2-3-1.

Results were mixed at best, with a superb win at Aberdeen for example compounded by maybe Rangers’ worst-ever loss at Ibrox, 1-5 to ‘them’.

This season has seen effectively a new squad arrive in Govan, and Pedro has adjusted his system entirely – to both use the players he has (there is literally only one problem position) and to adopt a more suitable SPL Rangers strategy.

While old-school Rangers managers have used varied formations, the most tried and tested one is the traditional 4-4-2 – and that is what Pedro is sending out there.

It has been a mixed bag this season, but recent results have seen a little momentum gather, even if the opponents have not quite been marquee.

But Celtic will be a whole other kettle of fish. Thomson appears to be suggesting a 4-5-1 – which is the formation Uncle Walter used for the ‘bigger’ matches when he was the midfielder’s manager. It was used in Europe and for trips to Pittodrie and most Old Firm encounters, but he did have the quality of player to handle it, with guys like Daniel Cousin holding the ball up top.

This is anything but to smear Morelos – regular readers will know how highly the site rates him. But we are less sure a four at the back will work in this one, and that is where our concerns lie.

Walter was not shy selecting up to six defenders in that 4-5-1 to essentially make it a 5-4-1 or even a 6-3-1when he felt it would be a hard match, and more often than not, certainly domestically, it got results. Opposition could not break Rangers down and we had pace to hit on the counter.

The current squad probably does not have that attacking pace, but a three at the back might just be a wise move. As good as Alves and Cardoso have been, the Old Firm is a cauldron which has reduced even the most hardened veterans; hence adding someone who has been there several times in the shape of Danny Wilson would probably be a very wise selection.

Rangers have practised the three and it has looked reasonable, and with two fullbacks supporting the defence while getting forward, it could give Celtic something to think about.

As for dropping a striker in the form of Miller or Morelos – we would be more inclined to drop Miller. His form at present is not impressive and Morelos’ is. The Colombian striker is superb at holding the ball up and his goalscoring exploits are only going to get better. Have Miller as an option later on if needed. He does usually deliver in the Old Firm matches.

Of course the likelihood is that should we play a 3 and drop a striker, it will be Miller himself who moves into midfield to accompany Jack and Dorrans. Personally we would prefer an energetic and tough-tackling Rossiter in there, but Pedro makes the call and Kenny seems to be a first pick regardless.

Whatever decisions Pedro goes with, a 4-4-2 is surely absolute suicide against Celtic. Even Walter rarely played that formation against the old enemy with better players than the ex-Nacional boss has, so sticking with the current strategy would be a worrying prospect against Rodgers’ men.

This Old Firm match actually carries less weight than usual. Rangers are not really expected to win – a draw at best. Rangers’ should be targeting the St Johnstones and Aberdeens for league placement until we are ready to challenge the Parkhead bunch – as such, anything gained from this clash is a bonus.

But as always, we will expect our Rangers to fight for every ball and give a worthy account of themselves. Regardless of the result.

Just, please, no more 1-5s.

18 comments:

  1. My team against Celtic. Foderingham, Wilson, Alves, Cardoso, Tavernier, Jack, Rossiter, Dorrans, Wallace, Windass & Morelos in a 3 - 5 - 1 - 1 line-up. WATP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Candeias? Apart from El Buffalo, he's been our best player recently. A threat down the right with his pace and wicked crosses

      Delete
    2. Well for me Rossiter & Jack a must in the 2!!.


      Tavi.
      Cardoso.
      Alves.
      John.

      Rossiter.
      Jack.

      Candeias.
      Pena. Free Role stay close and link up with CF
      Windass.

      Morelos.

      Subs.
      Dorrans.
      Herrera.
      Miller.



      Delete
  2. Nah. Stick with 4-4-2

    Fods

    Tav. Cardoso. Alves. Wallace

    Candeias. Dorrans. Jack. Windass

    Morelos. Hererra


    And go after they khunts. They're nothing special. Just need to keep it compact and press them high and fast. Their Defence is shite 👍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can you claim a team that has yet to lose a single domestic game has a shite defence?

      Genuinely asking. 🤔

      4-5-1 is definitely the best option, perhaps a 5-4-1

      Delete
  3. I'd say 4-5-1. Our best attacking outlet is Tav and candias down the right. Don't want to lose that. I even like the idea of springing pena on them from the start, by droping miller. See how the game pans out if we get ahead tighten it up later with Rossiter or if we're chasing we have the option of Niko.

    ReplyDelete
  4. KM and Krancjar must be dropped. Been the worst two players recently. Krancjar is dreadfully slow. Millers touch has not improved with age and he's all over the place. Doesn't link up with Morelos at all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fod
    Cardoso Alves Wilson
    Tav Wallace
    Jack
    Candieas Dorrans Pena
    Morelos

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why change what is working. Play to our strengths and not there's, I think morales and Herrar would put there cb's under far to much pressure, meaning there midfield will have to fall back. There defense has always been based on big guys pushing the strikers around, they won't be able to do that with Herrera and morales

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty naive to think what has worked against Dundee and Dunfermline, could possibly work against Celtic. Celtic dominated possession in all the games we played them last season, having 2 up front against guarnatees that we will be overun in midfield. This is a recipe for another hammering. Having 2 up top only helps if you can get plenty of service to them, otherwise they are passengers.

      Delete
    2. Last night showed how weak Celtic are at the back, most teams just sit back and don't press them, but the pressure on there centre backs and midfield with physical players, they only have good attacking players. But as u said if there no service then they are just passengers. And it's the exact same for Celtic, most teams in Scotland are scared of them and that's the problem

      Delete
  7. I'd go 3-5-2 but with Miller and Morelos up top. Miller's experience and knack of goalscoring in this fixture is vital to us.

    Wallace and Tav in wing back roles, with Dorrans, Jack and Windass in the central roles.

    Wilson, Alves and Cardoso at the back.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Same back four, suffocate midfield with Jack, Rossiter and Dorrans with Windass and Candeias out wide, Morelos up front

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree we need to protect our defence in this one. Foderingham, Wallace, Alves, Cardoso, Tav, Jack, Dorrans, Pena, Candeias, Windass, Morelos. 4-1-4-1. Morelos upfront himself with support from the midfield. Jack in front of the defence to assist. Subs - King Kenny, Kranchar and Rossiter, pending how the result is going.
    We will need energy and aggression and put the beggar Brown in his place!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Don't kno how anyone can say start with Pena he's not fit, give him the last 20 mins to break him in let him sit n watch from the side n see wat it's all about n how quick u will get shut down. For me 4-5-1 back 4 tav alves cordoso and Wallace.5 mid Candaias dorrans jack windass n Miller u just can't leave him out get him to support merelos as much as he can.

    ReplyDelete
  11. These comments sound like Rangers fear Them! They are ordinary and will be met by the blue force in 4-4-2 P.S.G showed them up tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sadly Windass has yet to prove that he can perform for more than 30 minutes so we should keep him in reserve. Mon the Gers

    ReplyDelete

By commenting on this article on Ibroxnoise.co.uk, you confirm you have read and understood the site terms, conditions, and moderation parameters (provided on the home page) of doing so.